Heimdall

Intended audience

Construction and engineering project teams investigating quality, change, document, design-coordination and field-evidence workflows.

Problems being explored

• Project knowledge spread across systems, disciplines and organisations.
• Difficulty tracing revisions, requirements and downstream effects.
• Actions and evidence separated from the decisions that created them.
• Heavy dependence on individual project memory.

Potential workflow applications

• Source-cited project knowledge retrieval.
• Change-to-action impact mapping.
• Quality process and evidence guidance.
• Drafting support for queries, reports and controlled records.

Human judgement remains necessary

Heimdall must not independently approve design, certify engineering adequacy, make accountable safety decisions or issue contractual records. Authorised project roles retain decisions and approvals.

Deployment and integration considerations

Potential sources include approved SharePoint or document-control systems. Identity, permissions, source authority, write-back, hosting, local caching, AI processing, retention and project rules require project-specific agreement and testing.

Current availability

Available evidence describes concept incubation and a pre-Investigator architecture. The design is explicitly not build-ready. Availability can only be assessed through discovery and a later, separately approved scope.